Insights

Mid-Year Outlook for 2024: Opportunity Knocks

  • 6 minute read
Dark mode saves between 3% - 6% energy. By reducing energy consumption we could help minimize damage to the environment.

Despite intensifying political uncertainty, heightened geopolitical tensions, and volatile commodity prices, we continue to see compelling investment opportunities across the global macro landscape. Accelerating AI demand for electricity, reorientation of global supply chains, improving labor productivity, and retirement security all represent important macro themes behind which to invest. We also remain really encouraged by the technical backdrop, as net issuance of Equities and Credit remains well below trend. However, it is definitely not business as usual in the world of macro and asset allocation, as our Regime Change thesis requires a different approach to portfolio management. To build upon this view, we have done more analysis to underscore the value of adding more non-traditional assets to one’s portfolio. Indeed, unlike in the past, today’s volatility in portfolios is being driven by stock-bond correlation, not by single asset volatility. Importantly, most of today’s CIOs have not invested in this type of environment. In terms of areas to lean in, we think that the current vintage will be a strong one for Private Equity, especially opportunities linked to value creation by operational improvement and/or corporate carve-outs. Meanwhile, we continue to pound the table on many parts of Real Assets, including Real Estate Credit, Infrastructure, and Asset-Based Finance. Finally, we see a lot of potential in Opportunistic Credit and Capital Solutions. On the risk side, we believe higher rates – especially if productivity should tail off – are a more challenging scenario than lower rates and slower earnings. We are also keeping an eye on employment trends. Our bottom line: Opportunity Knocks, as we still think the current economic cycle has further to run, a backdrop that should accrue to the benefit of long-term investors, especially ones who have dry powder to lean into the inevitable periodic dislocations that are likely to occur during a Regime Change.

A pessimist complains about the noise when opportunity knocks."
Oscar Wilde Irish poet and playwright
 

We are often asked, especially heading into the second half of 2024, if we still believe that the glass is half full for global allocators when it comes to deployment opportunities, particularly in an environment of heightened complexity, ‘sticky’ inflation, and higher for longer interest rates. (See Glass Half Full Outlook for 2024). With an uncertain presidential election around the corner in the United States, and many other important elections taking place across the world, there is certainly a lot to consider. On the more cautious side, equity markets are now nicely higher, and credit spreads are now sharply tighter since late December 2023 when we laid out our thesis that investors might regret looking at the glass as half empty. In fact, our KKR proprietary market-implied default model suggests HY spreads are pricing in about a two percent default rate today, compared with about three percent at the beginning of the year and a historical average of 5.7%.

EXHIBIT 1: Equity Markets Have Withstood Substantial Volatility to Enjoy Glass Half Full Returns and Then Some in the 1H24…

Equity Performance Across Regions, YTD Performance   

Bar chart showing equity performance year to date through June 7, 2024.
Data as at June 7, 2024. Source: Bloomberg.

EXHIBIT 2: …While Investors Have Also Gotten More Optimistic About the Outlook for Credit, High Yield in Particular

U.S. High Yield Implied Default Rate, %

Line chart showing U.S. High Yield Implied Default rates from 1990 through May 2024.
Data as at May 24, 2024. Source: Bloomberg.
Line chart showing U.S. High Yield Implied Default rates from 1990 through May 2024.
Data as at May 24, 2024. Source: Bloomberg.

EXHIBIT 3: Risk Assets Have Responded Favorably to the Idea That There Will Be Fewer Tightenings and More Easings

Consensus Forecast: % of Global Central Banks Hiking Rates

Line chart showing the percentage of global central banks that are hiking rates from 2003 through expectations through 2025.
Hiking rates is defined as an increase in rates over the past three months. Data for U.S., JP, CN, AU, CA, E2, NZ, NO, SE, GB, JP, CH, IN, ID, KR, PH, TW, TH, VN, BR, CL, ZA, TR, IL, CZ, HU, PL. Data as at May 31, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.
Line chart showing the percentage of global central banks that are hiking rates from 2003 through expectations through 2025.
Hiking rates is defined as an increase in rates over the past three months. Data for U.S., JP, CN, AU, CA, E2, NZ, NO, SE, GB, JP, CH, IN, ID, KR, PH, TW, TH, VN, BR, CL, ZA, TR, IL, CZ, HU, PL. Data as at May 31, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

EXHIBIT 4: Overall, Our Models Still Favor Credit, But Now Only at the Margin

Relative Value: Equities vs. Credit, Internal Rate of Return for Equities vs. HY YTW

Line chart showing relative value of U.S. Equities versus U.S. high yield credit as measured by internal rate of return.
Data as at May 24, 2024. Source: Bloomberg.
Line chart showing relative value of U.S. Equities versus U.S. high yield credit as measured by internal rate of return.
Data as at May 24, 2024. Source: Bloomberg.

However, perhaps more important for long-term investors, there are a lot of political and social crosscurrents that are increasingly bleeding their way into markets. Not surprisingly, the introduction of social media into our political process has created more discord. This type of disruption is like other post-industrial revolutions where technological change ushered in periods of social and political unrest. As our colleague Ken Mehlman explains, just as the invention of the printing press around 1440 introduced years of political, religious, social, and scientific disruption, the combination of the Internet and social media is a ‘Gutenberg 2’ moment that has produced and portends similar disturbances.

At the same time, complicated issues around immigration and inequality are also driving tense debates across the Western world that increasingly seem to push the left and right further apart. See Section IV, question #3 for a full discussion, but the upcoming U.S. presidential election only increases our conviction that policy from either a Trump or a Biden administration is likely to maintain an inflationary bent (which further heightens discord), given the threat of tariffs and the need for security spending, contributing to an increasing ‘normalization’ of wider than usual deficits. Finally, great power rivalries around the globe have intensified notably in recent quarters. As such, investors should expect more barriers to trade and capital flows in the coming years under almost all scenarios. Key to our collective thinking is that the intensifying focus on ‘homeland economics’ is a post-COVID, post-Ukraine global phenomenon that is likely to continue almost regardless of electoral outcomes in most countries.

EXHIBIT 5: After Two Years of Being in Late Cycle and Contraction, Our Proprietary KKR Cycle Indicator Is About to Move Into Its Early Cycle Phase

KKR Cycle Indicator (1990-Present, Z-Score)

Line chart showing a KKR economic cycle indicator from 1990 through present.
Data as at April 30, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.
Line chart showing a KKR economic cycle indicator from 1990 through present.
Data as at April 30, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

EXHIBIT 6: We Think Earnings Growth Is Set to Broaden Beyond Mega Cap Technology and Become More Balanced in Coming Quarters, Driven by Positive Operating Leverage and Margin Growth in Other Sectors

S&P 500 EPS Growth Disaggregation

Bar chart showing S&P 500 earning per share growth disaggregation from 2022 through 2024 estimates.
Data as at April 30, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

EXHIBIT 7: Long Periods of Equity Outperformance Have Been Driven by Productivity and/or Central Bank Intervention…

Table showing various statistics for periods of high productivity and low productivity.
Note: 1960s and 90s-00s are the ‘high’ productivity growth (>3%) periods, referring to 1958-1968 and 1995-2005, respectively. 1970s and 2010s are the ‘low’ productivity growth (<1.0%) periods, referring to 1973-1979 and 2010-2019, respectively. Data as at April 30, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

EXHIBIT 8: ...As We Look Forward, Our Thesis Is That Productivity Is Again Set to Reaccelerate, Which Would Be Quite Positive for Capital Markets

U.S. Annual Labor Productivity Growth, %

Bar chart showing U.S. annual labor productivity growth from the 1960s through today.
Note: 1960s refers to 1958-68; 1990s-00s refers to 1995-05; 1970s refer to 1973-79; 2010s refer to 2010-19; 1980s refers to 1980-88. Data as at March 31, 2024. Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

On the positive side of the ledger, growth and earnings – as our models have been suggesting for some time – are all performing better than the consensus expected in a higher nominal GDP growth environment. True, the U.S. consumer is not driving massive demand growth the way he or she was post-COVID, but unemployment has stayed low (Exhibit 10), inventories are in check, and housing activity is stabilizing. Also, we have seen a massive capex cycle being led by the Technology sector (Exhibit 9). Our view is that, similar to the Internet boom in the 1990s (and the corresponding period of solid economic growth leading up to 2000), the AI boom will drive a sustained period of higher capex before it is actually reflected in corporate profitability results. Implicit in what we are saying, though, is that the recent ongoing surge in productivity has actually occurred before AI benefits have been realized at scale, further underscoring our view that the corporate sector could enjoy a longer-tailed profitability renaissance. Importantly, though, unlike the dot-com bubble 20+ years ago, the companies financing this spending this cycle have bullet proof balance sheets, lower costs of capital, and a more consolidated market.

As we look ahead, we also want to signal another positive: Corporate earnings growth is beginning to broaden beyond just the Technology sector. One can see this in Exhibit 6. We think this increased breadth should create a more balanced tone within the liquid Equity markets. In addition, the technical picture remains quite compelling, with a lack of both net equity and corporate debt issuance (Exhibit 11), which generally bodes well for returns (Exhibit 12), especially in Private Equity.

EXHIBIT 9: The Magnificent 7 Reinvests 61% of Their Operating Free Cash Flow Back Into Capex and R&D. They Now Also Account for Almost 20% of Total Capex       

2024 Capex by Tech Magnificent 7 Compared to Total for U.S. Tech Equipment, Software, and R&D, US$  Billions

] Bar chart showing capital expenditure for the Magnificent 7 versus the total for U.S. tech equipment, software and R&D firms.
Data as at May 20, 2024. Source: Goldman Sachs.

EXHIBIT 10: We Think the Jobs Environment Is Much More Akin to the 1990s Than Post-GFC

Historic U.S. Job Losses and Recovery Trajectories

] Line chart showing U.S. job losses and recovery trajectories across recessions in 1990, 2001, 2008 and 2020.
Data as at December 31, 2023. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics.
] Line chart showing U.S. job losses and recovery trajectories across recessions in 1990, 2001, 2008 and 2020.
Data as at December 31, 2023. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics.

At the same time, we think that many investors are still actually underweight their target allocations, including holding too much Cash at a time when most central banks have finished raising rates (Exhibit 3). Our proprietary survey work within the Family Office (see Loud and Clear) and Insurance (see No Turning Back) segments supports this view, while money market/cash balances in the individual investor market are also quite high relative to trend.

EXHIBIT 11: Our Liquidity Indicator Is Still Recovering From Near-Trough Levels

Capital Markets Liquidity Trailing 12 Months as a % of GDP (IPO, HY Bond, Leveraged Loan Issuance)

Line chart showing capital markets liquidity as a percentage of GDP.
Data as at March 31, 2024. Source: Preqin, Bank of America, Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.
Line chart showing capital markets liquidity as a percentage of GDP.
Data as at March 31, 2024. Source: Preqin, Bank of America, Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

EXHIBIT 12: Private Equity Tends to Outperform Public Markets in Low Liquidity Environments

Private Equity Outperformance Across Liquidity Regimes, 1997-2023

Bar chart showing private equity outperformance across different liquidity environments.
PE returns from Preqin on a 5-year forward returns from 1997 – 2019 basis. Data as at December 31, 2023. Source: Preqin, Bank of America, Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.
Bar chart showing private equity outperformance across different liquidity environments.
PE returns from Preqin on a 5-year forward returns from 1997 – 2019 basis. Data as at December 31, 2023. Source: Preqin, Bank of America, Bloomberg, KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

Against this unique macroeconomic backdrop, however, we continue to argue that as investors we are experiencing a Regime Change. There remain four pillars to our original thesis: ongoing fiscal stimulus, heightened geopolitics, a messy energy transition, and stickier wages (driven largely by a shortage of skilled workers). If we are right, then global allocators and macro investors need to view their portfolios through a different lens. In particular, we think that more diversification across asset classes as well as less dependence on global sovereign bonds is warranted, especially given correlations between stocks and bonds have turned decidedly positive (Exhibit 14).

EXHIBIT 13: While Inflation Should Continue to Cool, We Don’t Think It Will Return to Previous Levels. As a Result, We Maintain Our Regime Change Thesis

Low and High Growth and Inflation Regimes

Graphic image showing both low and high growth and inflation environments.
Data as at June 14, 2024. Source: KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.
Graphic image showing both low and high growth and inflation environments.
Data as at June 14, 2024. Source: KKR Global Macro & Asset Allocation analysis.

So, where do we land as we look ahead to the second half of the year and into 2025 and beyond?

Acknowledgements
David McNellis, Frances Lim, Aidan Corcoran, Changchun Hua, Paula Campbell Roberts, Racim Allouani, Kristopher Novell, Brian Leung, Rebecca Ramsey, Tony Buckley, Bola Okunade, Rachel Li, Thibaud Monmirel, Yifan Zhao, Ezra Max, Miguel Montoya, Asim Ali, Patrick Holt, Patrycja Koszykowska, Koontze Jang, Allen Liu